Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Acosta v. Boe et al
as 0:2019cv00868
Defendant:
Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc., Kilen Boe, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Life Insurance Plan and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Retirement Committee of DAK Am v. Rodney Smith
as 16-1575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RETIREMENT COMMITTEE OF DAK AMERICAS LLC, as Plan Administrator of the DAK Americas LLC Pension Plan and TRANSAMERICA RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY B. SMITH
Defendant:
MARK STEPHEN BREWER, WARREN ALBERT GARRISON, HAROLD E. CORBETT and others
Retirement Committee of DAK v. Mark Brewer
as 16-1574
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RETIREMENT COMMITTEE OF DAK AMERICAS LLC, as Plan Administrator of the DAK Americas LLC Pension Plan and TRANSAMERICA RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK STEPHEN BREWER, WARREN ALBERT GARRISON, HAROLD E. CORBETT and others
Defendant:
MENDELL W. SMITH, OTELLA IRENE WEBB, JEROME BRYANT and others
Retirement Committee of DAK v. Mendell Smith
as 16-1572
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RETIREMENT COMMITTEE OF DAK AMERICAS LLC, as Plan Administrator of the DAK Americas LLC Pension Plan and TRANSAMERICA RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
MENDELL W. SMITH, OTELLA IRENE WEBB, JEROME BRYANT and others
Packer v. DAK Americas LLC Welfare Benefit Plan, et al
as 7:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
Vickie Packer
Defendant:
DAK Americas LLC Welfare Benefit Plan, Group Life and Dependent Life Insurance for Employees of DAK Americas, LLC, DAK Americas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Retirement Committee of DAK Americas LLC, et al v. Smith, et al
as 7:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Retirement Committee of DAK Americas LLC and Transamerica Retirement Solutions Corporation
Defendant:
Rodney B. Smith , Otella Irene Webb , Jerome Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
