Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Bardwell v. Dancehall, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01433
Plaintiff:
Tennyson Bardwell
Defendant:
Dancehall, LLC and Edwin Graham
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Tiscareno v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03841
Plaintiff:
Tony Tiscareno
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Blockbuster, Inc., Kristy Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Home Design Services v. A-John's Construction et al
as 2:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
Home Design Services
Defendant:
A-John's Construction , John Graham and LR Pope Engineering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Graham et al v. Durschlag
as 1:2012cv00623
Plaintiff:
Mark Graham and Mark Graham Communications LLC
Defendant:
M.E. Hank Durschlag
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alkiviades David et al v. CBS Interactive Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09437
Plaintiff:
Steven Batiz, Tony Bell, Detron Bendross and others
Defendant:
CBS Interactive Inc and CNET Networks Inc
Bill Graham Archives LLC v. Zeidan et al
as 4:2011cv04916
Plaintiff:
Bill Graham Archives LLC
Defendant:
Marwan Zeidan , Haight Ashbury Posters, Inc. and Afterthought Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Graham Insurance Group, Inc. v. Statronics, Inc.
as 0:2010cv61904
Plaintiff:
Graham Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Statronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
SED, Inc. of South Carolina v. Seahawk Marketing & Management, LLC et al
as 7:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
SED, Inc. of South Carolina
Defendant:
Joey Harrington , Seahawk Marketing & Management, LLC , Lucky Flops, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Graham Hanson Design LLC v. 511 9th LLC et al
as 1:2010cv05493
Plaintiff:
Graham Hanson Design LLC
Defendant:
511 9th LLC and Solly Assa
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
William A Graham Co v. Thomas Haughey, et al
as 10-2762
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM A GRAHAM CO, DBA The Graham Company
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS P. HAUGHEY and USI MIDATLANTIC INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
