Cases 141 - 150 of 78,598
Wang v. Manna Pro Products, LLC.
as 7:2024cv03592
Plaintiff:
Daoli Wang
Defendant:
Manna Pro Products, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Patent Infringement
Advanced Coding Technologies LLC v. Google LLC
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Sandpiper CDN, LLC v. Google LLC
as 2:2024cv03951
Plaintiff:
Sandpiper CDN, LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
QXMedical, LLC v. Vascular Solutions LLC
as 24-1572
Plaintiff:
QXMEDICAL, LLC
Defendant:
VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC, ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC, TELEFLEX LLC and others
AlmondNet, Inc. et al v. Lotame Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
AlmondNet, Inc., Intent IQ, LLC and Datonics, LLC
Defendant:
Lotame Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TEKTITE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SIRIUS SIGNAL, LLC
as 2:2024cv05941
Plaintiff:
TEKTITE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
SIRIUS SIGNAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
SCR Networks LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc.
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
SCR Networks LLC
Defendant:
Cisco Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS LTD. v. NINGBO AO SHENG MOLD CO., LTD. d/b/a AOSIMI
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS LTD.
Defendant:
NINGBO AO SHENG MOLD CO., LTD. d/b/a AOSIMI
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Infogation Corporation v. Porsche AG
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Infogation Corporation
Defendant:
Porsche AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC v. Fat Brands, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Fat Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
