Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Kwitek v. Pentel Pen Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00195
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Kwitek
Defendant:
Pentel Pen Corporation and Pentel Company, Ltd. Japan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bruce Technology LLC et al v. Corning Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv00425
Plaintiff:
Bruce Technology LLC, Bruce Technology LLC, Bruce Technology LLC and others
Defendant:
Corning Incorporated, Corning Display Technologies Taiwan Co., Ltd., Corning Japan K.K. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. v. Cyberlink Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd.
Defendant:
Cyberlink Corp., Cyberlink USA, Cyberlink.com Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Eastman Kodak Company v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Company., LTD et al
as 6:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
Eastman Kodak Company, Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Kodak Company
Defendant:
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company., LTD, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Victor Company of Japan Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. et al v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
as 1:2007cv01222
Plaintiff:
MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. and VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD.
Defendant:
PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
National Products Inc v. JVC Americas Corp et al
as 2:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
National Products Inc and National Products Inc
Defendant:
JVC Americas Corp and Victor Company of Japan LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Formfactor, Inc. v. Micronics Japan Co. Ltd. et al
as 3:2006cv07159
Plaintiff:
Formfactor, Inc.
Defendant:
Micronics Japan Co. Ltd. and MJC Electronics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
