Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Monib Zirvi v. Illumina Inc, et al
as 24-2644
Defendant:
RIP FINST, THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, LATHAM & WATKINS and others
Plaintiff:
MONIB ZIRVI
Merritt v. Inc. et al
as 3:2024mc80004
Plaintiff:
Splunk Inc.
Respondent:
Cribl Inc.
Defendant:
Clint Sharp
Petitioner:
Douglas Merritt
Merritt v. Inc. et al
as 1:2023mc01467
Petitioner:
Douglas Merritt
Defendant:
Cribl Inc. and Clint Sharp
Plaintiff:
Splunk, Inc.
ZIRVI v. ILLUMINA, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
MONIB ZIRVI
Defendant:
ILLUMINA, INC., AKIN GUMP STRAUSS ) HAUER & FELD LLP, LATHAM & WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Yondr, Inc. v. Win Elements, LLC, et al
as 22-56104
Appellant:
FREDERIC M. DOUGLAS
Plaintiff:
YONDR, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Counter Claimant:
WIN ELEMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company and JOHN NGUYEN, an individual
Richardson v. Adobe, Inc.
as 1:2022cv07114
Plaintiff:
Douglas G. Richardson
Defendant:
Adobe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hall Labs et al v. Hunter Douglas N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Hall Labs and SmarterHome
Defendant:
Hunter Douglas N.V., Hunter Douglas Industries, Hunter Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Richardson v. Pond5, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04963
Plaintiff:
Douglas G. Richardson
Defendant:
Pond5, Inc. and Shutterstock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Patent Infringement
Karamelion LLC v. Hunter Douglas Window Fashions, Inc
as 1:2020cv02604
Defendant:
Hunter Douglas Window Fashions, Inc. doing business as Electronic Solutions, Inc
Plaintiff:
Karamelion LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ERMI LLC v. Detroit Medical Devices, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv62493
Defendant:
Douglas B Jones and Detroit Medical Devices, LLC
Plaintiff:
ERMI LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
