Cases 31 - 40 of 71
HD Buttercup LP v. One Kings Lane Inc et al.
as 2:2014cv05020
Defendant:
Does and One Kings Lane Inc
Plaintiff:
HD Buttercup LP
Memory Lane, Inc. v. Classmates, Inc., et al
as 14-55912
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MEMORY LANE, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
CLASSMATES, INC. and UNITED ONLINE, INC.
Memory Lane, Inc. v. Classmates, Inc., et al
as 14-55462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEMORY LANE, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CLASSMATES, INC. and UNITED ONLINE, INC.
Dorsey et al v. Lane Franklin LLC
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dorsey and Natural Health Chiropractic Inc.
Defendant:
Lane Franklin LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC et al v. Nader et al
as 1:2013cv13023
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC , DD IP Holder LLC , Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and others
Defendant:
Anton Nader , 1384 Hylan Blvd. Inc. , Greaves Lane LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Kegel, LLC v. Lane Concepts, Inc.
as 8:2013cv01658
Plaintiff:
Kegel, LLC
Defendant:
Lane Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Lane Crawford L.L.C. v. Therapy L.L.C.
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
Lane Crawford L.L.C.
Defendant:
Therapy L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Lane Crawford L.L.C. v. Kelex Trading (CA) Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09190
Plaintiff:
Lane Crawford L.L.C.
Defendant:
Kelex Trading (CA) Inc. , Ka Wa Choi and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Beale v. Alexis Bittar, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07902
Plaintiff:
Eva Marie Beale
Defendant:
Alexis Bittar, Inc., A Jewelry Wonderland, Alene Too, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hunt Brothers Pizza, LLC v. 1112 Barberry Lane, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00588
Plaintiff:
Hunt Brothers Pizza, LLC
Defendant:
1112 Barberry Lane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
