Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 565
In re: Astrazeneca PLC Securities Litigation
as 22-2704
Plaintiff: Monroe County Employees' Retirement System, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff / Appellant: Nuggehalli Balmukund Nandkumar, Wayne County Employees Retirement System and Vladimir Zhukov
Defendant / Appellee: Pascal Soriot, Marc Dunoyer, Menelas Pangalos and others
Shash, et al v. Biogen Inc., et al
as 22-1773
Plaintiff / Appellant: NADIA SHASH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and AMJAD KHAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: VICTOR D. MENASHE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: BIOGEN, INC., MICHEL VOUNATSOS, ALFRED W. SANDROCK, JR. and others
Defendant: JEFFREY D. CAPELLO and MICHAEL MCDONNELL
Interested Party: LEONARD I. SHAPIRO, ALEXANDER BONDARENKO, IGOR RABINOVICH and others
Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A.
as 22-2438
Plaintiff: Michael Francisco, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Daniel LaMoureaux, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jesse Sherman and Arlette Sherman
Petitioner / Appellant: PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Pension Fund
Defendant / Appellee: Abengoa, S.A., Manuel Sanchez Ortega, Canaccord Genuity Inc. and others
Defendant: Santiago Seage, Barbara Zubiria, Ignacio Garcia Alvear and others
Jonathan Espy v. J2 Global, Inc., et al
as 22-55829
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN ESPY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: J2 GLOBAL, INC., VIVEK SHAH, NEHEMIA ZUCKER and others
ODS Capital LLC v. JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd
as 22-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee: ODS Capital LLC, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Altimeo Asset Management
Defendant / Appellant: JA Solar Holdings Co. Ltd, Baofang Jin and Shaohua Jia
In re: Ali Alavi, et al v. Genius Brands International, Inc., et al
as 22-55760
Not Classified By Court: In re: GENIUS BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALI ALAVI and A LEGACY FOUNDATION, Lead Plaintiffs; On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff: SALVADOR VERDIN and VINCENT CONTORNO, Consol Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee: GENIUS BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ANDY HEYWARD and ROBERT DENTON
Defendant: LYNNE SEGALL, Consol Defendant, MICHAEL KLEIN, Consol Defendant, MARGARET LOESCH, Consol Defendant and others
Colbert v. Rio Tinto PLC
as 22-1716
Plaintiff / Appellant: Anton Colbert, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Rio Tinto PLC, Rio Tinto Limited, Thomas Albanese and others
Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, et al v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 22-55686
Not Classified By Court: In re: MATTEL INC SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: HOUSTON MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES PENSION SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEKALB COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, lead Plaintiff and NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Appellant: JAMES J. HAYES
Defendant / Appellee: MATTEL, INC., MARGARET H. GEORGIADIS, JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER and others
Andrew Zenoff v. Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc., et al
as 22-55641
Not Classified By Court: In re: SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW R. ZENOFF, Lead Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., HENRY JI and MARK R. BRUNSWICK
Mark Habelt, et al v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-15660
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK HABELT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant / Appellee: IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., KEVIN M. KING, MICHAEL J. COYLE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?