Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, et al v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 22-55686
Not Classified By Court: In re: MATTEL INC SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: HOUSTON MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES PENSION SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEKALB COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, lead Plaintiff and NEW ORLEANS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Appellant: JAMES J. HAYES
Defendant / Appellee: MATTEL, INC., MARGARET H. GEORGIADIS, JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER and others
James Hayes, et al v. Accretive Health, Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2191
Plaintiff - Appellee: LINDA WONG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant: JAMES J. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee: ACCRETIVE HEALTH, INCORPORATED, MARY A. TOLAN and JOHN T. STATON
In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. SEC. LITIGA
as 13-55613
: In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff: HARRY STACKHOUSE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMS, FKA Institutional Investor Group, ROBERT M. MOSS and FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
Defendant: TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, and certain of its officers, directors, and affiliates, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES USA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: JAMES J. HAYES
Hayes v. Harmony Gold Mining Company
as 13-635
Plaintiff: Certified Class
Plaintiff - Appellant: James J. Hayes, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Bernard Swanepol and Nomfundo Qangule
Defendant - Appellee: Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Femenia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00803
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: John W. Femenia , Shawn C. Hegedus, Danielle C. Laurenti and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hayes v. Harmony Gold Mining Company Li
as 12-118
Plaintiff - Appellant: James J. Hayes, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Bernard Swanepol and Nomfundo Qangule
Defendant - Appellee: Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
Hayes v. Harmony Gold Mining Company Li
as 11-3609
Plaintiff - Appellant: James J. Hayes, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Bernard Swanepol and Nomfundo Qangule
Defendant - Appellee: Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited
In Re: SFBC International Inc, et al, et al
as 08-2075
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES J. HAYES
Plaintiff - Appellee: AR TEACHER RET SYS
Plaintiff: MA PENSION FUND GRP, MA PUB PENSION FUNDS, BEROUKHIM GRP and others
Defendant - Non-Participating: FRED KEPLER and HELEN KEPLER
Defendant: E. COOPER SHAMBLEN, MARC LEBEL, GERALD SEIFER and others
Defendant - Appellee: ARNOLD HANTMAN, GREGORY B. HOLMES, JACK LEVINE and others
Hayes v. Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv03653
Plaintiff: James J Hayes, James J Hayes and James J Hayes
Defendant: Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited, Bernard Swanepol and Nomfundo Qangule
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Desert Orchid Partners, et al v. Transaction Systems Architects, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1720
Plaintiff - Appellee: Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, Desert Orchid Partners, L.L.C., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nancy Rosen, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: Dwight G. Hanson, Transaction Systems Architects, Inc., William E. Fischer and others
Interested Party: James H. Sykora, Thomas G. Foley, Alan Young and others
Interested Party - Appellant: James J. Hayes and James J. Hayes
Defendant: Greg Duman and Harlan F. Seymour

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?