Cases 1 - 10 of 13
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv13488
Plaintiff:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. , J. MICHAEL PEARSON, HOWARD B. SCHILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re Willis Towers Watson plc Proxy Litigation
as 1:2017cv01338
Defendant:
Willis Group Holding plc, Valueact Capital Management, Jeffrey W. Ubben and others
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Retirement System
Petitioner:
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council as the Administering Authority of Greater Manchester Pension Fund, Hudson Bay Master Fund Ltd. and Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
POTTER v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv07658
Petitioner:
Miami Fire Fighters' and Police Officers' Retirement Trust, Paul Alvater, California Public Employees Retirement System and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MULTI-STRATEGY MASTER FUND LIMITED, BLACKROCK CREDIT ALPHA MASTER FUND, L.P., LORD ABBETT BOND-DEBENTURE FUND, INC. and others
Defendant:
THEO MELAS-KYRIAZI, PHILIDOR NETWORK ENTITIES, VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TIMBER HILL LLC, LAURA POTTER and CITY OF TUCSON TOGETHER WITH AND ON BEHALF OF THE TUCSON SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Special Master:
HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Not Classified By Court:
Cathy Lochridge
Amicus Curiae:
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Lead Plaintiff:
TIAA-CREF
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The Regents of the University of California v. American International Group, Inc et al
as 1:2014cv01270
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc , Martin J. Sullivan, Steven J. Bensinger and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The Regents of the University of California v. American International Group, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv03653
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc , Martin J. Sullivan, Steven J. Bensinger and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Montana Board of Investments et al
as 1:2012cv08379
Plaintiff:
Montana Board of Investments , Teacher Retirement System of Texas , California Public Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Henry A. McKinnell, John L. LaMattina and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Newby, et al v. Enron Corp
as 08-20648
Appellant:
GEORGE S BISHOP, JILL R BISHOP, LON WILKENS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Metzler Investment, et al v. Corinthian Colleges, et al
as 06-55826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
METZLER INVESTMENT GMBH
Plaintiff:
CONWAY INVESTMENT CLUB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC., DAVID MOORE, ANTHONY DIGIOVANNI and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Newby, et al v. Enron Corp, et al
as 06-20026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SILVERCREEK MANAGEMENT INC, SILVERCREEK LP, SILVERCREEK II LTD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC and BANK OF AMERICA CORP
Plaintiff - Appellee:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
CA State Teachers Re, et al v. Homestore.Com, Inc., et al
as 04-55665
Plaintiff:
T. JEFFREY SIMPSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMESTORE.COM, INC., STUART H. WOLFF, PETER B. TAFEEN and others
Amicus Curiae:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and THE BOND MARKET ASSOCIATION; THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES; THE CLEARING HOUSE ASSOCIATION L.L.C.; AND THE SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
