Cases 101 - 110 of 1,867
Bowe v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00577
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Bowe
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gamboa v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00465
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Rosendo Gamboa
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Serrano v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00466
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Teresa Serrano
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Prather v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01075
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Prather
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Logan v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv05908
Plaintiff:
Charles William Logan
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Loftis v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv09278
Plaintiff:
Sherry Gaye Loftis
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Asher v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00831
Plaintiff:
Dennis Asher
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pressley v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv08461
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pressley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Lopez v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00464
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Ruben Lopez
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Murdock v. Astrue
as 12-5191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINA MURDOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
