Cases 21 - 30 of 14,648
Donald v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Renee Donald
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gilbert v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02308
Not Yet Classified:
Joe W. Brown
Plaintiff:
Sam L Gilbert
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Vanburen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Tyler A Vanburen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Curlett v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Madison Curlett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McPherson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Monte McPherson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Drinkwater v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03848
Plaintiff:
Mary Drinkwater
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Owens v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06029
Plaintiff:
Letia Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Muldrow v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03378
Plaintiff:
Denise Lynn Muldrow
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seiber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jamie L Seiber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Moore v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Cannon W.C. Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
