Cases 11 - 20 of 123
GBEDEMAH v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2020mc00128
Plaintiff:
DANIEL KWAKU GBEDEMAH
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
WEINSCHENK v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2020mc00063
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RYAN WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
WITCHCRAFT RIDDLER TAKES TOKYO et al v. JAPAN LEGAL SYSTEM et al
as 2:2020cv00510
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM, JAPAN, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
WITCHCRAFT RIDDLER TAKES TOKYO
In Re:
BLACK MAGICK BEARS CULT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03821
Plaintiff:
Dr. PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER and NO PARTY
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Garner v. Vanhorn et al
as 1:2019mi00169
Defendant:
Jessica Edward, Central Intelligence Agency, Scott Meredith and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Rena Garner
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Garner v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2019mi00170
Defendant:
Francesea Williams, Nanda Ross, Contravious Burson and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Rena Garner
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Garner v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2019mi00171
Defendant:
S. Gauthier, Midtown Blue, Public Safety Police Department, Federal Police and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Rena Garner
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 6:2019cv06752
Plaintiff:
Tedric Kenon Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2019cv01908
Defendant:
George D Bush, Richfield Minnesota Police Department, Wendy Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Charise L Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Banks v. Tre Arc Games et al
as 2:2019cv06748
Defendant:
Kyoto Japan Arson Fire, Central Intelligence Agency, The Dry Eye Zone and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
