Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Shea et al v. Colvin
as 8:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
Stephen F. Shea and Scott B. Elkind
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Robinson v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00091
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David C. Robinson
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Montoya et al v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01505
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Debbie Montoya and Laurie J. Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Foss v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02385
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Foss
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khan v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01173
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Khalid Hasan Khan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Marasco and Nesselbush, LLP v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00506
Petitioner:
Marasco and Nesselbush, LLP
Respondent:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nolan v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01177
Plaintiff:
Paul W. Nolan
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lowe v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00145
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Lowe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Johnson, Sallie v. Colvin, Carolyn, et al
as 07-7121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sallie L. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Or her successor(s) in her/his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Department of Human Services and Carolyn W. Colvin individually, Gayle L. Turner, Or her successor(s) in his/her official capacity as Chief Administrator/DHS/YSA at Oak Hill Youth Center, and Gayle L. Turner individually, George Perkins, Or his successors in her/his official capacity as Administrator/Secure Facilities at Oak Hill Youth Center and George Perkins individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
