Cases 21 - 30 of 60
BULLARD v. RETRIEVAL-MASTER CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
AMBER BULLARD
Defendant:
RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clark v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
James Clark
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Mediator:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Tuzzolino v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc
as 8:2015cv00455
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tuzzolino
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Young v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01663
Plaintiff:
Milagros Young
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hall v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv10433
Plaintiff:
David Hall
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUTCHINS v. RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
as 1:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
MELISSA HUTCHINS
Defendant:
RETRIEVAL-MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Forlizzo v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 8:2014cv03140
Plaintiff:
Richard Forlizzo
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Mikel v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 4:2014cv01622
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mikel
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cutro v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 0:2014cv61528
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cutro
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
