Cases 31 - 40 of 203
Gayle et al v. Field Office Director Miami Field Office et al
as 1:2020cv21553
Petitioner:
Rene Jonathan Rosas Cardenas, Roseline Ostine, Mohamed Hasan and others
Respondent:
Field Office Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Attorney General
Special Master:
Matthew C Dates
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rodney Martin, Hatem Chourabi, Esq. Sharon Kegerreis and others
Intervenor:
Reinier Guiba Avila, Luis Enrique Lopez-Pena, Lazaro Jose Gutierrez Suarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ricardo Ramos v. Citibank, N.A.
as 8:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramos
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
The Lankershim Group v. Michelle Ramos et al
as 2:2019cv10823
Defendant:
Michelle Ramos and Christopher Coakley
Plaintiff:
The Lankershim Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gil-Ramos v. Consumer Financial Services of Tampa, FL, L.L.C.
as 8:2019cv01637
Plaintiff:
Jose Gil-Ramos
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Services of Tampa, FL, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos et al v. Patrick K. Willis Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10217
Defendant:
JMAC Recovery, American Recovery Service, Inc., Patrick K. Willis Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Ramos and Felix Varela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abreu et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12318
Plaintiff:
Michael Fabozzi, John Lampasone, Carol Robles-Roman and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Agri et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11619
Plaintiff:
John Craney, Richard Rodriguez, Stephen Wheeler and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Jose Ramos v. Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A.
as 2:2018cv10209
Defendant:
Chase Bank U.S.A., N.A.
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
William Ramos v. Irma Lopez
as 18-35734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM GILBERTO RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
IRMA YOLANDA LOPEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
