Cases 31 - 34 of 34
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 09-1041
Plaintiff:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, doing business as Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK T. GANGI
Third Party Defendant:
GLOBAL NAPS NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC., GLOBAL NAPS REALTY, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
:
, , and others
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Anderson et al
as 1:2008cv11364
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Defendant:
Zack Anderson, RJ Ryan, Alessandro Chiesa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, et al
as 08-1278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBAL NAPS, INC., GLOBAL NAPS, INC., CHESAPEAKE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VERIZON NEW ENGLAND
Defendant:
MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, JAMES CONNELLY and others
:
, , and others
Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, LLP
as 2:2004cv00715
Plaintiff:
Lorillard Tobacco Company , Philip Morris USA Inc. and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company
Defendant:
Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, LLP , Brown, Terrell, Hogan, Ellis, McClamma & Yegelwel, PA , Barrett Law Offices and others
Counter_claimant:
Lewis and Lewis , Frederick B Clark, Esq. , McTeer & Associates and others
Counter_defendant:
Lorillard Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company
Movant:
BTHEMY (FL) FUNDING II LLC , FH (FL) FUNDING II LLC , GP (FL) FUNDING II LLC and others
Respondent:
Gentry and Phillips, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
