Cases 31 - 39 of 39
COFIELD v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01442
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC. , ERIC HOLDER , GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Oluwashina Ahmed-Al-Khalifa v. Richard Parsons, et al
as 13-2587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLUWASHINA KAZEEM AHMED-AL-KHALIFA
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD H. PARSONS, Federal Public Defender, JONATHAN E. HAWLEY, Federal Public Defender, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Whitfield v. Finkle et al
as 1:2013cv04910
Plaintiff:
BenyeHudah Whitfield
Defendant:
Lester Finkle, Luciano Panici, Douglas J. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
ANAEME v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PHARMACY et al
as 5:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C ANAEME
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PHARMACY, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, GEORGIA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING BOARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01906
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , San Diego County, California, San Diego County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Brien v. Gayle et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dustin O'Brien
Defendant:
Ana Maria C. Gayle and Public Defender Service Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island v. Rhode Island Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2009cv00508
Plaintiff:
Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island
Defendant:
Rhode Island Office of Public Defender and John J. Hardiman
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
In re: Jury Selection Information
as 6:2009mc00101
IN RE: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2008mc00554
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
