Cases 41 - 50 of 137
Amrani et al v. Johnson et al
as 5:2016cv00434
Plaintiff:
Rachid Amrani and Edga Acedo
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson and Leon Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pineros v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pineros
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson and Leon Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Tian v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv03478
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Zhi Keng Tian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hazime v. Johnson et al
as 8:2016cv01378
Plaintiff:
Kamal Hazime
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez, Tony Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Zhu v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv02679
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Plaintiff:
Yong Mei Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MISHRA v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
SANJEEV KUMAR MISHRA
Defendant:
LEON RODRIGUEZ, JEH JOHNSON and MARK HAZUDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sager et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv05402
Plaintiff:
Jason Sager and Ana Maria Darie
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Leon Rodriguez , Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Arapi et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 4:2016cv00692
Plaintiff:
Eriola Arapi , Samina Syed , Wafaa Alwan and others
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Jeh Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Nasser v. USCIS District Director et al
as 2:2016cv11737
Plaintiff:
Mohamed M Nasser
Defendant:
USCIS District Director, USDHS, Loretta E Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pineda v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv01368
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Leon Rodriguez and Conrad Zaragoza
Plaintiff:
Dinora Marisol Pineda
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
