Cases 41 - 50 of 72
PegaSync Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2014mc50440
Petitioner:
PegaSync Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Rudy Patros
Woodward et al v. Scott Lowery Law Offices, P.C.
as 1:2013cv07665
Plaintiff:
Rudy Woodward and Nicholas Woodward
Defendant:
Scott Lowery Law Offices, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Douglas Kurash et al v. Hyundai Motor America et al
as 8:2012cv02164
Plaintiff:
Holly Amromin, John Chapman, Marcell Chapman and others
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motors America Inc
Texas Wire Wheels, LLC v. Navar
as 4:2012cv03146
Plaintiff:
Texas Wire Wheels, LLC
Defendant:
Rudy Navar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Goldberg et al v. Gerova Financial Group, Ltd et al
as 1:2011cv07107
Plaintiff:
Margie Goldberg , Maurice Hanan , Renee Salam Hanan and others
Defendant:
Gerova Financial Group, Ltd , Stillwater Capital Partners, LLC , Stillwater Capital Partners, Inc. and others
Movant:
Stillwater Investors
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Edmundo Pardo Rubi v. Patrick K. O'Toole
as 2:2011cv06695
Defendant:
Cynthia G Aaron, Jan M Adler, Edwin Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Edmundo Pardo Rubi
Hernandez et al v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Lili Aleman, Monica Araiza, John Armbruster and others
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., Marilyn Lowe and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Goldberg et al v. Gerova Financial Group, Ltd et al
as 1:2011cv01385
Defendant:
Jack Doueck, Gerova Financial Group, Ltd, Lou Hensley and others
Plaintiff:
Margie Goldberg, Maurice Hanan and Renee Salam Hanan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
United States of America v. Rose
as 4:2011mc00005
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rudy Rose
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Nido v. U.S. Bank
as 4:2011cv00005
Plaintiff:
Rudy Nido
Defendant:
U.S. Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
