Cases 51 - 60 of 77
HUMPHREYS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., INC. et al
as 5:2011cv06362
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L. HUMPHREYS and BRIAN C. HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., INC., MCCABE, WEISBERG AND CONWAY, P.C., TERRENCE J. MCCABE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUMPHREYS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., INC.
as 5:2011cv06361
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L. HUMPHREYS and BRIAN C. HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Concord Telephone Exchange, Inc. et al v. Halo Wireless, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00796
Plaintiff:
Concord Telephone Exchange, Inc. , Humphreys County Telephone Company , Tellico Telephone Company and others
Defendant:
Halo Wireless, Inc. and Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Humphrey v. Continental Service Group, Inc.
as 6:2011cv06376
Plaintiff:
Bryan Humphrey
Defendant:
Continental Service Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Raheem v. Humphrey
as 1:2011cv01454
Petitioner:
Askia Mustafa Raheem
Respondent:
Carl Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
United States of America ex rel David L Humphrey v. Hocking, Athens, Perry Community Action Agency Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel David L Humphrey
Defendant:
Hocking, Athens, Perry Community Action Agency Inc , Robert Garbo , Roger Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Humphrey v. MRS Associates, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv01793
Plaintiff:
Edith Humphrey
Defendant:
MRS Associates, Inc. and John and Jane Does Numbers 1 Though 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Humphrey v. Simm Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Elma Humphrey
Defendant:
Simm Associates, Inc. and Account Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Humphrey v. Allied Interstate, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Barbara Humphrey
Defendant:
Allied Interstate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
