Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Angel v. Sauk Village et al
as 1:2024cv01876
Plaintiff:
Scott Angel
Defendant:
Sauk Village, SV Donuts, Inc, Lenny's Gas n Wash Sauk Trail LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hirschler et al v. Brochard et al
as 1:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hirschler and Sherry Rae Hirschler
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Brochard, Nona E. Brochard and Doe 1, Doe 2 and Doe 3
Counter Claimant:
Joe Langlinais
Cross Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and Halliday Watkins & Mann, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Robert Patterson v. John B. Mann et al
as 8:2023mc00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Patterson
Defendant:
John B. Mann
Mann v. Usher Raymond et al
as 2:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Original Mann and Cyrus Gasby
Defendant:
Usher Raymond and Lil Jon
In re Gravity Imaging, LLC
as 4:2023mc51389
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Angelo, Cory Justin Mann, Rosina Angelo and others
Interested Party:
Gravity Imaging, LLC
Sikhs for Justice et al v. Mann et al
as 1:2023cv02578
Plaintiff:
Sikhs for Justice, Singh and Kaur
Defendant:
Bhagwant Mann, Banwarilal Purohit and Gaurav Yadav
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1350 Alien Tort Claims Act
Herndon v. Horace Mann Life
as 23-20006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob Rea'shaw Herndon
Defendant / Appellee:
Horace Mann Life Insurance Company
Manns et al v. PHH Mortgage Services
as 2:2022cv03507
Plaintiff:
Blake Manns and Danielle Manns
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LASSITER v. ADERHOLT et al
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, RICK ALLEN, JODEY ARRINGTON and others
Debtor:
RANDY WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
In Re: Brandon Michael Mann
as 2:2022mc00167
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Mann
Respondent:
Eric J. Holcomb, Bob Grennes, Tammy Tschetter and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
