Cases 1 - 10 of 46
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20758
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv10018
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80210
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80215
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Armenia Ingram v. ADT, LLC
as 22-5042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENIA INGRAM, on behalf of herself and on behalf of all other similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
ADT, LLC
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02905
Plaintiff:
SHANA DOTY and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and TELESFORO AVILES
Petitioner:
ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
Strange v. ADT LLC.
as 9:2021cv81818
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
ADT LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Naiman v. ADT LLC
as 2:2020at00887
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Plaintiff:
Sidney Naiman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Naiman v. ADT LLC
as 2:2020cv01821
Defendant:
ADT LLC and Native Media LLC
Plaintiff:
Sidney Naiman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Ingram v. ADT LLC (PLR2)
as 3:2020cv00376
Plaintiff:
Armenia Ingram
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
