Cases 1 - 10 of 296
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edmond et al v. Olympus Property, UMB
as 4:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Edmond, Derrick Edmond and FBI
Defendant:
Olympus Property, UMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILL v. NBC NEWS et al
as 1:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
NBC NEWS, JENNIFER BUSH, STEVEN VIOREL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Naser v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv06551
Plaintiff:
Ayman Naser
Defendant:
Secretary of the DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Thomas Cioppa, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PS) Khayat v. FBI/Joelle K. Peele
as 2:2022cv01758
Plaintiff:
Josette A. Khayat
Defendant:
FBI, Joelle K. Peele and FBI/Joelle K. Peele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamada Hussein v. Eric Schmitt, et al
as 22-2891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Stephen Schmitt, MO Attorney General, FBI, Satellite Office in Southern MO, Neosho Police Department and others
Mark Adams v. MI, et al
as 22-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MARY ADAMS SEMCKEN, SUSAN KAY ADAMS and others
Dwelle v. FBI et al
as 2:2022cv11257
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dwelle
Defendant:
FBI, Terry Julaice, Burns Gregory and others
GHASSAN et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv01575
Plaintiff:
OMAR GHASSAN, OO, MO and others
Defendant:
Biden, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
