Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Hernandez v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau Inc
as 3:2018cv01774
Plaintiff:
Blanca Hernandez
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brannon v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Brannon
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MORALES v. RETRIEVAL MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
as 2:2017cv04788
Plaintiff:
DIANA GALVAN MORALES
Defendant:
RETRIEVAL MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pfountz v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureaus, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02586
Plaintiff:
Deborah Pfountz
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureaus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02496
Plaintiff:
Cherry Evans
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Perry v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2017cv04667
Plaintiff:
Amanda Perry
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kares v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc
as 8:2017cv01366
Plaintiff:
Philip Kares
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Prescott v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 0:2017cv60934
Plaintiff:
Amber Prescott
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jairam v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
as 0:2017cv60634
Plaintiff:
Anita Jairam
Defendant:
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harding v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. Dba American Medical Collection Agency
as 1:2017cv01177
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Harding
Defendant:
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
