Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
United States of America v. Amgen, Inc.
as 17-1522
Plaintiff:
United States of America, and the States of Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of California, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of Colorado, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D. and others
Appellant:
Daniel Coyne, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
Amgen, Inc.
United States of America v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 15-2449
Plaintiff:
State of New York, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, State of Delaware, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, District of Columbia, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Bishop, Robert Krauss and United States of America, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss
Defendant - Appellee:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and The Clearing House Association, L.L.C.
Movant:
Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund
United States of America ex rel. et al v. Omnicare, Inc. et al
as 1:2015mi00018
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., State of California ex rel., State of Delaware ex rel. and others
Defendant:
Omnicare, Inc., Omnicare Pharmacy of Texas 2, LP, Omnicare Pharmacy of Florida, LP and others
Movant:
Altacare Corporation
Estate of Robert Cunningham v. Millennium Laboratories of Cal
as 14-1911
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel Robert Cunningham, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, ex rel and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF ROBERT CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04098
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLC
Amicu:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: M 22-1 Designation by U.S. Attorney of individual to accept service of summons and complaint
In re: Standard & Poor's Rating Agency Litigation
as 1:2013md02446
Plaintiff:
State of Maine , Dustin McDaniel , Arizona, State of and others
Defendant:
MCGraw-Hill Companies Inc , Standard and Poor's Financial Services LLC , Moody's Corporation and others
Amicu:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter v. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General and Reporter
Defendant:
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Other Statutory Actions
US, et al v. Guidant Corporation, et al
as 12-1867
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF ARKANSAS, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEIDI HEINEMAN-GUTA, Relator
Defendant - Appellee:
GUIDANT CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Guidant Corporation
USA, et al v. MedQuest Associates, Inc., et al
as 11-6520
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel. and KAREN J. HOBBS
Defendant - Appellant:
MEDQUEST ASSOCIATES, INC., BIOIMAGING AT CHARLOTTE, INC., BIOIMAGING OF COOL SPRINGS, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
