Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis v. Sansei, Inc.
as 1:2019cv11195
Defendant:
Sansei, Inc. d/b/a Health Street and Sansei, Inc
Plaintiff:
Dontae T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nixon v. Foxwood Financial, LLC et al.
as 3:2016cv02355
Defendant:
Michael T. Davis, Davis & Galm, LLC and Foxwood Financial, LLC
Plaintiff:
Deborah Marie Nixon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. Nebraska Furniture Mart, et al
as 13-3214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEBRASKA FURNITURE MART, INC., EVANS & MULLINIX, P.A. and JO ANN BUTAUD
Davis v. Nebraska Furniture Mart, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02559
Plaintiff:
James T. Davis
Defendant:
Nebraska Furniture Mart, Inc., Evans & Mullinix, P.A. and Jo Ann Butaud
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boatman et al v. Ginn-La Hammock Beach LTD, LLLP et al
as 3:2008cv00784
Plaintiff:
Patrick W. Boatman and Maureen A. Boatman
Defendant:
Ginn-la Hammock Beach Ltd, LLLP, Ginn-la Hammock Beach Ltd, LLLP, Richard T. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Goldberg v. Davis
as 1:2008cv20877
Plaintiff:
Michael I. Goldberg and Michael I. Goldberg
Defendant:
Michael T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
DAVIS v. CREDITMAX COLLECTION AGENCY, INC.
as 1:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
LISA T. DAVIS, LISA T. DAVIS, LISA T. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
CREDITMAX COLLECTION AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Massinello et al v. Johanns et al
as 5:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
Mary Massinello, Mary Massinello, Roberto Massa and others
Defendant:
Mike Johanns and Russell T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Berry, Steven K. v. Funk, Sherman M., et al
as 97-5257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven K. Berry
Defendant - Appellee:
Sherman M. Funk, Genta Hawkins Holmes, Stephen D. Mull and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
