Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
as 1:2024mc00052
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Gonzales v. Enidan Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02389
Plaintiff:
Nickson Gonzales
Defendant:
Enidan Enterprises, LLC and Jamal King
3Rd Party Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Superior Handling Equipment, LLC, Superior Handling Equipment, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sterling Knight Pharmaceuticals LLC v. United States Postal Service Office of the Inspector General
as 1:2019mc21342
Plaintiff:
Sterling Knight Pharmaceuticals LLC
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Office of the Inspector General
v. United States Postal Service, Office of the Inspector General
as 0:2019mc60773
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Darris v. United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General
as 2:2010mc03512
Petitioner:
Ashley Curtis Darris
Respondent:
United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
QUAYLE et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
as 2:2008cv05891
Movant:
FRED QUAYLE and ANITA QUAYLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
