Cases 1 - 10 of 14,001
O Crane v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Bryan O Crane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
United States of America v. In the Matter of the Search of: the United States Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505 5138 1059 4136 8110 38,further described in Attachment A
as 1:2024mc00380
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
In the Matter of the Search of: the United States Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505 5138 1059 4136 8110 38,
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant:
United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: $18,300.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2024mc00016
Not Yet Classified:
$18,300.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
In Re: $11,502 in United States Currency
as 4:2024mc00017
Not Yet Classified:
$11,502 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
In Re: $25,107.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2024mc00018
Not Yet Classified:
$25,107.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
In Re: $13,086 in United States Currency
as 4:2024mc00020
Not Yet Classified:
13,086 in United States Currency and $13,086 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Poblete
as 4:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Katherine Poblete
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Mark Adams v. USA, et al
as 24-1429
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, SAGINAW COUNTY, MI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
