Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Cofield et al v. LinkedIn Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Chere Nedd, Arviette Cofield, Orian Cofield and others
Defendant:
PNC Bank, FSB, Passport Motors Holdings, Inc., Texas Roadhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brown et al v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05144
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laurie Brown, Oluwakemi Fosudo and Abigail Musick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv05875
Plaintiff:
Donna Lindgens
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Stano v. J.M. Smucker LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Madeline Stano
Defendant:
J.M. Smucker LLC and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Guzman v. Walmart
as 4:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Jaime Guzman
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Driskill v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Driskill
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
SPITZENBERGER et al v. BEECH-NUT NUTRITION COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv12103
Plaintiff:
D.M.P., ANNIE POMPA MOREJON, C.R.C. and others
Respondent:
C.V.P., AMERICA CARDONA, J.P. and others
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY SPITZENBERGER
Defendant:
RUBY PEREZ CHINO, BEECH-NUT NUTRITION COMPANY, INC., PLUM PBC and others
Interested Party:
PLUM PBC doing business as PLUM ORGANICS and ALFRED WAYSLOW
Jeske et al v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 9:2023cv81122
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Jeske and Jan M. Jeske
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Pifzer, Sanofi and others
Walmart Inc. v. Galaxy Venture Capital, LLC
as 8:2023mc00011
Petitioner:
Walmart Inc.
Respondent:
Galaxy Venture Capital, LLC
Environmental Democracy Project v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Environmental Democracy Project
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Universal Textiles UK Ltd., PHV Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.