Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
California Department of Toxic Substance Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00729
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co Inc, Ameron International Corporation, Anardarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Plaintiff: California Department of Toxic Substance Control and The California Toxic Substances Control Account
Arconic, Inc. et al., v. APC Investment Co., et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06456
Plaintiff: Arconic Inc, Alcoa Inc, Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and others
Defendant: Lakeland Development Company, APC Investment Co., Associated Plating Company and others
Intervenor Defendant: Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
Not Classified By Court: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Intervenor: Federal Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant: PMC, Inc., Philip E. Kamins, Silvey & Silvey, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0901 Comprehensive Response, Compensation & Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06695
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
The Dow Chemical Company et al v. Anglers E & C, Inc., f/k/a Fish Engineering & Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00387
Plaintiff: The Dow Chemical Company , Gulfco Restoration Group , Chromalloy American LLC and others
Defendant: Anglers E & C, Inc., FECP, Ltd., Allied Marine Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
USA v. Dow Chemical Corporation, The We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02330
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Dow Chemical Company, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-132
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Olin Corporation, Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and others
Third-Party-Defendant: United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant: Recochem
Defendant - Appellee: Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-148
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff: Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and Corigan Sanoian, Individually and d/b/a Quad Technologies
Third-Party-Plaintiff - Appellant: Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant: United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant: Recochem and E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Defendant - Appellee: Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
United States of America v. Alcoa Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00210
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Alcoa Inc., Baker Hughes Inc., BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
United States of America v. The Dow Chemical Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv13330
Defendant: The Dow Chemical Company
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Team Enterprises, LLC v. Western Investment Real Estate, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-16916
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEAM ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant: WESTERN INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE TRUST, AKA Western Properties Trust and WPT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: PK II CENTURY CENTER LP, PAN PACIFIC RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC., as a corporation and as successor-in-interest to Western Investment Real Estate Trust, KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION, as a corporation and as successor-in-interest to Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. and others
Third-party-defendant: CITY OF MODESTO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?