Cases 11 - 20 of 22
State of NJ Dept of Env Protec v. US Army Corps of Eng
as 11-1424
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DE RIVER KEEPER NETWORK, DE RIVER KEEPER, DE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENG, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army in his official capacity, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
State of Delaware Department o v. US Army Corps of Eng
as 11-1421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NJ DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
DE RIVER KEEPER NETWORK, DE RIVER KEEPER, DE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENG, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army in his official capacity, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
State of Delaware Department v. US Army Corps of Eng
as 11-1283
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL AND NATURAL RESOURCES and STATE OF NJ DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
DE RIVER KEEPER NETWORK, DE RIVER KEEPER, DE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENG, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army in his official capacity, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Village of Bald Head Island v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 7:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Village of Bald Head Island
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , John McHugh and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Town of Caswell Beach and Town of Oak Island, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2010cv01220
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
LISA JACKSON, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, JOHN MCHUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Patuxent Riverkeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 8:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
Patuxent Riverkeeper
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Robert L. Antwerp, John McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Friends of Back Bay et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 2:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF BACK BAY and BACK BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD.
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , JOHN MCHUGH , Robert L. Van Antwerp and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
State of Delaware, et al v. US Army Corps of Eng, et al
as 10-1389
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL AND NATURAL RESOURCES and STATE OF NJ DEPT OF ENV PROTECTION
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
DE RIVER KEEPER NETWORK, DE RIVER KEEPER, DE NATURE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENG, JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army in his official capacity, JO-ELLEN DARCY, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
PHILA REGIONAL PORT
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. Paul Souza, et al
as 10-10370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, a District of Columbia Non-Profit Corporation, CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, a Florida Non-Profit Corporation, COLLIER COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY, a Florida Non-Profit Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL SOUZA, Field Supervisor, South Florida Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, STEVE SULLIVAN, Chief, South Permits Branch, Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Army and others
FRIENDS OF BACK BAY et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2009cv02371
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF BACK BAY and BACK BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN MCHUGH, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
