Cases 11 - 20 of 39
McDonald et al v. City of Thomasville, AL et al
as 1:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Clarence McDonald and Cynthia Bryant McDonald
Defendant:
City of Thomasville, AL, Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Thomasville, AL and Water Treatment Plant of the City of Thomasville, AL
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE et al v. MCDONALD et al
as 1:2016cv03297
Plaintiff:
MARY T. BOOKWALTER, INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE, INDIANA INTERCHURCH CENTER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. MCDONALD, NATIONAL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Govt of the Province Manitoba, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-5203
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba and State of Missouri, ex rel Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General's Office
Defendant - Appellee:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, John W. Keys, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, MaryAnne C. Bach, Great Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
State of North Dakota
McDonald v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02690
Plaintiff:
Travis W. McDonald
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Kendall v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Alvin L. Kendall
Defendant:
Jonathan Jones, Brandon Waters , Andy Sloan and others
Counter_claimant:
Daniel Hathaway , Brandon Waters and David Hathaway
Counter_defendant:
Alvin L. Kendall
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-17143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-17144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Defendant:
LESTER A. SNOW
Intervenor-Defendant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
Gencarelli v. McDonald's Corporation
as 1:2011cv05573
Plaintiff:
James Gencarelli
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Family Farm Alliance, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-16679
Plaintiff:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STEWART & JASPER ORCHARDS and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FAMILY FARM ALLIANCE
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and THE BAY INSTITUTE
Metropolitan Water District of v. USFWS, et al
as 11-16662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, ROWAN GOULD, Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
