Cases 81 - 90 of 134
State of New York v. Adamowicz
as 14-1702
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
One Adams Blvd. Realty Corp.
Defendant:
Mary Adamowicz, as trustee under a deed of trust for the benefit of Bonnie Ann Fraser and as trustee under a deed of trust for the benefit of Mary Margaret Fraser, National Heatset Printing Corp., Rudy, AKA Rudolph P. Marconi and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Adamowicz, III, individually and as trustee under a deed of trust for the benefit of Michael Adamowicz IV and Elizabeth M. Fraser, individually and as successor trustee under a deed of trust as successor trustee under deed of trust for the benefit of Mary Margaret Fraser
Counter-Claimant:
Ms. Bonnie Ann Fraser
Murtaugh v. State of New York
as 14-233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Murtaugh Recycling Corp., Flood Drive Properties, Inc., Gail Murtaugh, Individually, DBA Crosby Hill Auto Recycling and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Pete Grannis, As Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, Op-Tech Environmental Services, Inc., State of New York and others
PA Dept of Envirn Protection, et al v. Allegheny Energy Inc, et al
as 14-1584
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF NEW YORK and STATE OF MARYLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEGHENY ENERGY INC, ALLEGHENY ENERGY SERVICE CORP, ALLEGHENY ENERGY SUPPLY CO and others
The State of New York v. PVS Chemicals, Inc. (New York)
as 14-324
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
The State of New York
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
PVS Chemicals, Inc. (New York)
State of North Carolina v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 09-1623
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Roy Cooper, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Intervenor:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and others
The State of New York et al v. Town of North Hempstead et al
as 2:2013cv06355
Defendant:
Franklin Stainless Corp., Gilford Holdings Ltd., Industrial Fasteners Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martens and The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Camillus Clean Air Coalition et al v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Camillus Clean Air Coalition , Robert and Colleen Bartlett , William and Michelle Barrington, III and others
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Amicu:
State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 - Cause of Action Arising under CERCLA
United States of America et al v. Alcoa Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv00337
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of New York and St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant:
Alcoa Inc. and Reynolds Metals Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-132
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Olin Corporation, Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant:
Recochem
Defendant - Appellee:
Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
State of New York v. Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
as 13-148
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
State of New York
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Mader Capital Corp., 3163 Buffalo Avenue Corporation and Corigan Sanoian, Individually and d/b/a Quad Technologies
Third-Party-Plaintiff - Appellant:
Olin Corporation
Third-Party-Defendant:
United States of America, Occidental Chemical Corporation, The City of Niagara Falls, New York and others
Defendant:
Recochem and E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Solvent Chemical Company, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
