Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Jones
as 2:2023mc00425
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Respondent:
Seth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Jones
as 3:2023cv01905
Respondent:
Seth Jones
Petitioner:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daretha Braziel, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARETHA BRAZIEL, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of RB, next friend of DB, next friend of DR, KEESHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of KJ, next friend of DJ, next friend of TC, next friend of KB, IEASHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan and others
Defendant:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, iindividually and in her official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, LIESL CLARK, Director, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS MUHAMMAD, Mayor, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL O'MALLEY, Water Plant Operator, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, a Municipal Corporation, through the Benton Harbor Water Department
Columbia Riverkeeper v. The Neil Jones Food Company
as 3:2023cv05818
Plaintiff:
Columbia Riverkeeper
Defendant:
The Neil Jones Food Company, The Neil Jones Food Company d/b/a Northwest Packing Company, a Washington corporation and The Neil Jones Food Company a Washington corporation doing business as Northwest Packing Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
BKK Working Group v. 1700 Santa Fe Ltd et al
as 2:2018cv05810
Defendant:
A.C. Barrel & Drum, A.J. Daw Printing Ink Corp., A.D. Service Publications and others
Plaintiff:
BKK Working Group, Rohr, Inc., California Resources Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Cleo Watkins, et al v. Lawrence County, Arkansas, et al
as 23-1939
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cleo Watkins, Pyles Family Farms LLC, Victor Hutcheson, originally named as Victor Hutcherson and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lawrence County, Arkansas, John Thomison, in his official capacity as County Judge of Lawrence County Arkansas, William Powell, In his official capacity as a member of the Lawrence County Quorum Court and others
Cleo Watkins, et al v. Lawrence County, Arkansas, et al
as 23-2110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cleo Watkins, Pyles Family Farms LLC, Victor Hutcheson, originally named as Victor Hutcherson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lawrence County, Arkansas, John Thomison, in his official capacity as County Judge of Lawrence County Arkansas, William Powell, In his official capacity as a member of the Lawrence County Quorum Court and others
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Wade v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 1:2023cv20187
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Wade
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs, Passion L Sullivan, Kalautie S. Janghari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
