Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS et al v. REGAN
as 1:2022cv03724
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES AGAINST TOXICS, CLEAN POWER LAKE COUNTY, RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
WildEarth Guardians v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Bureau of Reclamation and Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Intervenor Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Arconic, Inc. et al., v. APC Investment Co., et al.,
as 2:2014cv06456
Plaintiff:
Arconic Inc, Alcoa Inc, Alpha Therapeutic Corporation and others
Defendant:
Lakeland Development Company, APC Investment Co., Associated Plating Company and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Intervenor:
Federal Insurance Company
3Rd Party Defendant:
PMC, Inc., Philip E. Kamins, Silvey & Silvey, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0901 Comprehensive Response, Compensation & Liability
Comite de Ciudadanos Unidos de El Cenizo et al v. Webb County Texas
as 5:2014cv00041
Defendant:
Webb County Texas
Plaintiff:
Comite de Ciudadanos Unidos de El Cenizo , Alianza de Rio Bravo por Agua Pura , Bertha Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 13-1359
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, a Colorado non-profit corporation and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as the Chief Forester of the U.S. Forest Service, THOMAS MALECEK, in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Rio Grande National Forest and others
NL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. OLD BRIDGE TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2013cv03493
Cross Defendant:
UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ATLANTIC BATTERY CORPORATION, PHV HAROLD L. SEGALL and others
Counter Defendant:
ATLANTIC BATTERY CO., UNITED STATES ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS, JOE KRENTZMAN & SON, INC. and others
Defendant:
Crown Battery Manufacturing Company, RIO TINTO MINERALS, AMETEK, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
MICHAEL P. LAST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 12-1133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, a Colorado non-profit corporation and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, ABIGAIL R. KIMBELL, in her official capacity as the Chief Forrester of the US Forest Service, TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as the Chief Forester of the U.S. Forest Service and others
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Rio Bravo Fresno, et al.
as 1:2011cv02150
Defendant:
Rio Bravo Fresno, North American Power Group, Ltd. and Rick Spurlock
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Rio Bravo Fresno et al
as 1:2011at00822
Defendant:
Rio Bravo Fresno, North American Power Group, Ltd. and Rick Spurlock
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
