Cases 1 - 10 of 11
YOUNG v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2021cv00739
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Young v. Annual Report of Blocked Property TDF 90-22.50 et al
as 1:2019cv05324
Defendant:
Dept. of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control and Annual Report of Blocked Property TDF 90-22.50
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. (OGIS)(FOIA) et al
as 1:2018cv05313
Defendant:
LAF, Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois, CFPB and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. State of Nevada
as 2:2016cv00562
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Helena Reilly, et al v. State of Arizona, et al
as 11-15822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELENA REILLY and PAUL REIILY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, TERRY L. GODDARD, RYAN NOLAND and others
Young v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 3:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Denise P. Young
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Reilly et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2010cv08227
Plaintiff:
Helena Reilly and Paul Reilly
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Terry L Goddard, Ryan Noland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meek v. Department of the Army et al
as 5:2009cv00422
Plaintiff:
Jerrald Meek
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Little & Young, Inc. and James A. McLean, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KIM v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2009cv01740
Plaintiff:
HYE YOUNG KIM
Defendant:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and FRANCIS TERRY MCNAMARA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
KIM v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
HYE YOUNG KIM
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO and MICHAEL AYTES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
