Arbitration Cases
Cases 21 - 25 of 25
Amerind Risk Management Corp. v. Blackfeet Housing, et al
as 15-2089
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMERIND RISK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Section 17 federally chartered corporation
Defendant - Appellee: BLACKFEET HOUSING, BLACKFEET HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #1, BLACKFEET HOUSING AUTHORITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #2 and others
Defendant: NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING FUND I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING FUND IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Amerind Risk Management Corporation v. Blackfeet Housing et al
as 1:2015cv00072
Plaintiff: Amerind Risk Management Corporation
Defendant: Blackfeet Housing, Blackfeet Housing Limited Partnership #1, Blackfeet Housing Limited Partnership #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Home Buyers Warranty Corp. v. Lois Hanna We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1834
Petitioner - Appellant: HOME BUYERS WARRANTY CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, NATIONAL HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, (a Risk Retention Group) a Colorado corporation and NEW HOME WARRANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, (a Risk Retention Group) a Colorado corporation
Respondent - Appellee: LOIS HANNA
Home Buyers Warranty Corporation et al v. HKPW Masonry, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12444
Petitioner: Home Buyers Warranty Corporation , National Home Insurance Company (a Risk Retention Group) and New Home Warranty Insurance Company (a Risk Retention Group)
Respondent: HKPW Masonry, Inc. , Jeffrey Phillips, Randolph Engineering Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Home Buyers Warranty Corporation et al v. Hanna
as 2:2013cv01859
Petitioner: Home Buyers Warranty Corporation , National Home Insurance Company (a Risk Retention Group) and New Home Warranty Insurance Company (a Risk Retention Group)
Respondent: Lois Hanna
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?