Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. Halish
as 3:2018cv04666
Petitioner:
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC
Respondent:
Judith Halish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Montgomery Sibley
as 16-2305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD W. BLACK, LITTLER MENDELSON, P. C. and JOSHUA B. WAXMAN
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Sibley
as 8:2016cv01459
Plaintiff:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Defendant:
Montgomery B. Sibley
Thirdparty_defendant:
Littler Mendelson, PC., Richard W. Black and Joshua B. Waxman
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Montgomery B. Sibley
Counter_claimant:
Montgomery B. Sibley
Counter_defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. Wahid Areso
as 5:2015cv00237
Respondent:
Wahid Areso
Petitioner:
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC
CarMax Auto SuperStores, Inc. v. Ellison
as 3:2014cv00890
Petitioner:
CarMax Auto SuperStores, Inc.
Respondent:
Sylvia Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. Rosella Hernandez
as 2:2014cv08743
Petitioner:
Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC
Respondent:
Rosella Michelle Hernandez
CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC v. Man Tang
as 2:2014cv06215
Petitioner:
CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC
Respondent:
Man Tang
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. Tang
as 2:2014cv06155
Petitioner:
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC
Respondent:
Man Tang
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. Taroob Slmani
as 5:2014cv01532
Petitioner:
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC
Respondent:
Taroob Slmani
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. Trindad Herrera
as 5:2014cv01531
Petitioner:
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC
Respondent:
Trinidad Herrera
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
