Cases 1 - 10 of 49
ENGLEHARDT et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01865
Intervenor:
FREDERICK CARLYLE BENSON, AUGUST CORA WILDMAN, DIANA CAMPUZANO and others
Plaintiff:
YVONNE DORA WADE and JOSEPH PAUL ENGLEHARDT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Giacoletty Vaquedano et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Sandy Giacoletty Vaquedano, Kevin Jimenez Rodas, Daniela Garcia Soto and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Full Care of Louisville, Inc. et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Full Care of Louisville, Inc. and J Santos Gonzalez Mosqueda
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Michael L. Zervas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, Danny Buzzetta, Dr. Gregor Winkel and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cruz-Vazquez v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 3:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Cruz-Vazquez
Defendant:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), US Department of Homeland Security, Hon. Alejandro N. Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
State of Florida v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 23-11644
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, CANIZARES LAW GROUP LLC, CATHOLIC CHARITIES LEGAL SERVICES and others
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 23-11528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE, THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE and others
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Manchanda v. Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department et al
as 1:2023cv03356
Petitioner:
Rahul Dev Manchanda, Esq.
Respondent:
Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department, Remi Shea, Jorge Dopico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Diaz v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Deve
as 23-397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lydia Gonzalez Diaz, on behalf of a class of similarly situated tenants of the New York City Housing Authority at Harlem River Houses, Vanessa Walsh, on behalf of a class of similarly situated tenants of the New York City Housing Authority at Harlem River Houses, Nina Crawford, on behalf of a class of similarly situated tenants of the New York City Housing Authority at Harlem River Houses and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, New York City Housing Authority, Harlem River Perservation LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
