Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Riverside Rehab & Healthcare et al v. Theresa A. Eagleson
as 1:2023cv05104
Plaintiff:
Riverside Rehab & Healthcare, Lakeside Rehab & Healthcare, Lake Cook Rehab & Healthcare and others
Defendant:
Theresa A. Eagleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
ROLLING MEADOW RANCH GROVES, LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
as 2:2021cv14058
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Petitioner:
ROLLING MEADOW RANCH GROVES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00431
Intervenor:
Provident Irrigation District, State Water Contractors, Maxwell Irrigation District and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff:
Golden State Salmon Association, Bay.Org, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Petitioner:
People of the State of California, California Natural Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant:
Oakdale Irrigation District, Knights Landing Investors, LLC, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Natural Resources Agency, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00426
Plaintiff:
State of California by and through California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, California Environmental Protection Agency and California Natural Resources Agency
Intervenor:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, State Water Contractors, Westlands Water District and others
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sacramento River Intervenors, Oji Brothers Farm, Inc., Sutter Mutual Water Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Northport Health Services of Arkansas LLC et al v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 5:2019cv05168
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff:
NWA Nursing Center, LLC, Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC, Atkins Care Center, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association, American Association for Justice, Justice in Aging and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al
as 18-16219
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, SUNNYSIDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BEN DU VAL and others
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al
as 18-16220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, SUNNYSIDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BEN DU VAL and others
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 17-17007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, SUNNYSIDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BEN DU VAL and others
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 17-17006
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, SUNNYSIDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BEN DU VAL and others
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 17-15812
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, SUNNYSIDE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BEN DU VAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
