Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Crossgate v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
City of Crossgate
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and David J. Shulkin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bruce Becker v. David Shulkin, Secretary, et al
as 17-50871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE BECKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, THOMAS J. MURPHY, Principal Deputy Under Secretary for Benefits, Department of Veterans Affairs and MARLAN P. WALDROP, Regional Director, Veterans Affairs Houston Regional Office
Samadi v. Shulkin
as 5:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Vijaya Samadi, MD
Defendant:
David J. Shulkin, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bayaud Enterprises, Inc. et al v. US Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2017cv01903
Plaintiff:
Bayaud Enterprises, Inc. and SourceAmerica
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs, David J. Shulkin and USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ian Murray v. Robert McDonald, et al
as 17-5619
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN F. MURRAY
Respondent:
SECRETARY ROBERT A. MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
NATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND et al v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2017cv00992
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND , BOSMA INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC. and WINSTON-SALEM INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , DAVID J. SHULKIN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant:
PDS CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Witthoft v. Shulkin et al
as 4:2017cv02680
Defendant:
Meghan Flanz and David J. Shulkin
Plaintiff:
Jesse M. Witthoft
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Magalhaes v. Shulkin
as 4:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Alvaro C Magalhaes
Defendant:
David J. Shulkin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
