Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kayitesi et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Claudine Kayitesi, Emmanuel Nshimrimana, Emma Neza and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
LANGDON et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv03366
Plaintiff:
GRANT CHARLES NORMAN LANGDON, ROBYN MARY HAMILTON, EMMA RUTH LANGDON and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ordaz v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2021cv04079
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, John Kramar, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Ordaz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Uxul Gonzalez v. Paul et al
as 3:2020cv00971
Defendant:
USA, USCIS, Director Michael Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Aracelly Uxul Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Menendez v. McAleenan et al
as 4:2019cv02428
Defendant:
ACTING SECRETARY Kevin McAleenan, Wallace L. Carroll and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Plaintiff:
Emma Diaz Menendez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Aaron Skalka, et al v. John Kelly, et al
as 17-5102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aaron Skalka, Emma Skalka, Ryan Scheel and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Evan Lee, Jennifer Lee, Robert Ayers and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John F. Kelly, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Rex W. Tillerson, Secretary, U.S. Department of State, in his official capacity and James McCament, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity
SKALKA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
AARON SKALKA , EMMA SKALKA , EVAN LEE and others
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and JOHN F. KERRY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
