Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee: Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae: The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner: Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems v. State of Oregon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01486
Plaintiff: Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems
Defendant: State of Oregon, Oregon Health Authority and Patrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
The United States v. State of Idaho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff: The United States and United States of America
Defendant: State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant: Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae: New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James
as 22-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant: National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., Beretta U.S.A. Corp., Davidson's, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Letitia James, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Amicus Curiae: Montana, National Rifle Association of America, City of New York and others
Petitioner: Ryan Bussee
Project Veritas, et al v. Michael Schmidt, et al
as 22-35271
Plaintiff / Appellant: PROJECT VERITAS and PROJECT VERITAS ACTION FUND
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Multnomah County District Attorney and ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General
United States of America v. State of Texas Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Farhoud et al v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02226
Plaintiff: Star Krest, Inc., Tyler Sherman, Crystal Sherman and others
Defendant: Governor Kate Brown, City of Portland, Multnomah County of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Axos Bank v. Rosenblum We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01712
Plaintiff: AXOS BANK
Defendant: State of Oregon and Ellen F. Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Project Veritas et al v. Schmidt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01435
Plaintiff: Project Veritas Action Fund and Project Veritas
Defendant: Michael Schmidt, Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum and Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?