Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Unico Mechanical Corp., et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-15094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNICO MECHANICAL CORP., a California corporation and ALFRED CONHAGEN, INC. OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations, DIANE RAVNIK, in her official capacity as the Chief of the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AFL-CIO
Assured Guaranty Corporation, et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al
as 17-1044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASSURED GUARANTY CORPORATION, ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA-PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, INGRID RIVERA-ROCAFORT and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
Ndioba Niang, et al v. Emily Carroll, et al
as 16-3968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ndioba Niang and Tameka Stigers
Defendant - Appellee:
Emily Carroll, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Missouri Board of Cosmetology and Barber Examiners, Wayne Kindle, In his official capacity as a member of the Missouri Board of Cosmetology and Barber Examiners, Jackie Crow, In her official capacity as a member of the Missouri Board of Cosmetology and Barber Examiners and others
Defendant:
Betty Leake
Assured Guaranty Corp., et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al
as 16-2208
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASSURED GUARANTY CORPORATION, ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEJANDRO GARCIA-PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, INGRID RIVERA-ROCAFORT and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
John and Jane Does 1-104 v. Wasden et al
as 1:2016cv00429
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden, Kevin Kempf, Terry Kirkham and others
Plaintiff:
John and Jane Does 1-104
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company v. Garcia-Padilla et al
as 3:2016cv01095
Plaintiff:
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Alejandro Garcia-Padilla , Juan C. Zaragoza-Gomez , Ingrid Rivera-Rocafort and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Assured Guaranty Corp. et al v. Garcia-Padilla et al
as 3:2016cv01037
Plaintiff:
Assured Guaranty Corp. , Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. and Ambac Assurance Corporation
Defendant:
Alejandro Garcia-Padilla , Juan C. Zaragoza-Gomez , Ingrid Rivera-Rocafort and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unico Mechanical Corp. et al v. Harris et al
as 2:2015cv00996
Defendant:
Kamala Harris , Christine Baker , Diane Ravnik and others
Plaintiff:
Unico Mechanical Corp. and Alfred Conhagen, Inc. of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BlueMountain Capital Managemen v. Doe, et al
as 15-1272
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BLUEMOUNTAIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, for and on behalf of investment funds for which it acts as investment manager
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN DOE, in his official capacity as employee or agent of the Government of Puerto Rico Development Bank for Puerto Rico
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO GARCIA-PADILLA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico and CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of Justice of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
BlueMountain Capital Managemen v. Garcia-Padilla, et al
as 15-1221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BLUEMOUNTAIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, for and on behalf of investment funds for which it acts as investment manager
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO GARCIA-PADILLA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico and CESAR R. MIRANDA-RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of Justice of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, in his official capacity as employee or agent of the Government of Puerto Rico Development Bank for Puerto Rico
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
