Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-15100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aurora Loan Services LLC v. Thomas Harrison et al
as 2:2010cv06715
Plaintiff:
Aurora Loan Services LLC
Defendant:
DOES, Thomas Harrison, Jennifer Lee Hoyman and others
Thomas Harrison et al v. The State of California et al
as 2:2010cv06688
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Eric Holder, Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harrison, Jennifer Lee Hoyman, Joan Hoyman and others
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv00641
Plaintiff:
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary, Defend Affirmative Action Party (DAAP) and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Regents of the University of California and Mark Yudof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Free Market Fdn v. Reisman, et al
as 08-50965
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A REISMAN, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Ethics Commission, RAYMOND R DAVENPORT, in his official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission, WILHELMINA DELCO, in her official capacity as a member of the Texas Ethics Commission and others
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Watson et al v. Hortman et al
as 2:2008cv00081
Defendant:
Gregory Hortman, Carl Turner, Gulf Coast Cancer & Diagnostic Center at South East Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Watson, Adriane Springs, Dianne Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Free Market Foundation et al v. Reisman et al
as 1:2008cv00116
Plaintiff:
Free Market Foundation, Free Market Foundation, Free Market Foundation and others
Defendant:
David A. Reisman, Raymond R. Davenport, Wilhelmina Delco and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
