Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Anthony Navarro, et al v. Langdon Neal, et al
as 12-3572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY P. NAVARRO, DAVID B. NAVARRO, SCOTT CAMPBELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LANGDON D. NEAL, Member of the Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago as a Duly Constituted Electroal Board, in his/her official capacity, RICHARD A. COWEN, Member of the Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago as a Duly Constituted Electroal Board, in his/her official capacity and MARISEL A. HERNANDEZ, Member of the Board of Election Commissioner for the City of Chicago as a Duly Constituted Electroal Board, in his/her official capacity
Navarro et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2012cv07535
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Navarro , David B Navarro , Scott Campbell and others
Defendant:
Langdon D. Neal , Richard A. Cowen and Marisel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Neal Conroy v. Chicago Police Department
as 12-2047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEAL CONROY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
Conroy v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2012cv02325
Plaintiff:
Neal Conroy
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conroy v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2012cv01579
Plaintiff:
Neal Conroy
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Neal et al v. CAC Financial Corporation
as 6:2011cv06084
Defendant:
CAC Financial Corporation
Plaintiff:
David Neal and Karen Neal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Summers et al v. Adams et al
as 3:2008cv02265
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Summers, Robert M Knight, Sanford T Marcus and others
Defendant:
Marcia S Adams and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neal v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2007cv08025
Plaintiff:
Richard Leland Neal
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Robert Devries, Rochelle Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
