Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Dawn Sherman v. Christopher Koch
as 09-1455
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAWN S. SHERMAN, a minor, through ROBERT I. SHERMAN, her father and next friend, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER KOCH, State Superintendent of Education
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Hairston v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2008cv02828
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Hairston
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
American Petroleum Institute, et al v. Roy A. Cooper, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
as 5:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
American Petroleum Institute and National Petrochemical and Refiners Association
Defendant:
Roy A. Cooper, III, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Bishop v. Bartlett
as 07-1840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. BISHOP, JACK L. MOORE, MICHAEL A. JOYCE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY O. BARTLETT, Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, LARRY LEAKE, LORRAINE G. SHINN and others
Majeed et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2007cv00184
Plaintiff:
Burnie Majeed, Sr., Burnie Majeed, Jr. and Kenya Majeed
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, NC Administration Office of the Court, University of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
HEWETT v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2007cv00250
Plaintiff:
ALVIN L. HEWETT
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MAJEED et al v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2007cv00222
Plaintiff:
BURNIE MAJEED, SR., BURNIE MAJEED, JR. and KENYA MAJEED
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NC ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE COURT, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
