Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Amy Bryant v. Joshua Stein
as 24-1617
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D., KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
Amy Bryant v. William Brawley
as 24-1600
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, KODY H. KINSLEY, in his official capacity as the North Carolina Secretary of Health and Human Services, PHD MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, M.D. and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Amy Bryant v. Timothy Moore
as 24-1576
Defendant:
PHD, FNP-BC SHARONA Y. JOHNSON, WILLIAM M. BRAWLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board, JD JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina Medical Board and others
Intervenor:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILIP E. BERGER
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, NC VALUES INSTITUTE, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL and others
BRYANT v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Defendant:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JEFF NIEMAN, KODY H. KINSLEY and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
BRYANT et al v. WOODALL et al
as 1:2016cv01368
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D. , BEVERLY GRAY, MD , ELIZABETH DEANS, MD and others
Defendant:
JIM WOODALL , ROGER ECHOLS , ELEANOR E. GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
