Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Caremark LLC et al v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff: Caremark LLC and CaremarkPCS Health LLC
Defendant: Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff: DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee: GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Poe et al v. Drummond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff: Peter Poe, Paula Poe, Patrick Poe and others
Defendant: Gentner Drummond, Steven Katsis, Trevor Nutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Meyer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff: William Carol Clarke
Defendant: Kevin Meyer, Shelley Hughes, Tom Begich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DRUMMOND et al v. ROBINSON TOWNSHIP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01127
Plaintiff: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., GPGC LLC and WILLIAM DRUMMOND
Defendant: ROBINSON TOWNSHIP and MARK DORSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarrant Regional v. Herrmann, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-6184
Plaintiff - Appellant: TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT, a Texas State Agency
Defendant - Appellee: RUDOLF JOHN HERRMANN, JESS MARK NICHOLS, FORD DRUMMOND and others
City of Hugo, et al v. Nichols, et al
as 10-7044
Plaintiff - Appellant: CITY OF HUGO, an Oklahoma municipality and HUGO MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, an Oklahoma Public Water Trust for the benefit of the City of Hugo, Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee: JESS MARK NICHOLS, in his official capacity as member of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board and the Oklahoma Water Conservation Storage Commission, RUDOLF JOHN HERRMANN, in his official capacity as member of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board and the Oklahoma Water Conservation Storage Commission, ED FITE, in his official capacity as member of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board and the Oklahoma Water Conservation Storage Commission and others
Intervenor: CITY OF IRVING
City of Hugo, et al v. Nichols, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-7043
Plaintiff: CITY OF HUGO, an Oklahoma municipality and HUGO MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, an Oklahoma Public Water Trust for the benefit of the City of Hugo, Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee: JESS MARK NICHOLS, in his official capacity as member of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board and the Oklahoma Water Conservation Storage Commission, RUDOLF JOHN HERRMANN, in his official capacity as member of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board and the Oklahoma Water Conservation Storage Commission, ED FITE, in his official capacity as member of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board and the Oklahoma Water Conservation Storage Commission and others
Intervenor - Appellant: CITY OF IRVING
City of Hugo, et al v. Nichols, et al
as 09-7047
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITY OF HUGO, an Oklahoma municipality and HUGO MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY, an Oklahoma Public Water Trust for the benefit of the City of Hugo, Oklahoma
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee: CITY OF IRVING
Defendant - Appellant: JESS MARK NICHOLS, RUDOLF JOHN HERRMANN, ED FITE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?