Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv02107
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Douglas A Ducey, Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs and others
Petitioner:
Emanuel McCray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Xponential Fitness et al v. Arizona, State of et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv01310
Plaintiff:
Xponential Fitness, AKT Franchise LLC, Stretch Lab Franchise LLC and others
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Douglas A Ducey, Cara M Christ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Monarch Content Management LLC et al v. Arizona Department of Gaming et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv04928
Defendant:
Ted Vogt, Chuck Coolidge, JC McClintock and others
Plaintiff:
Laurel Racing Association Incorporated, Monarch Content Management LLC and Laurel Racing Association Incorporated a Maryland corporation doing business as Laurel Park
Intervenor Defendant:
Arizona Downs LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Khashan v. State of Arizona et al
as 2:2007cv00067
Plaintiff:
Mikail Khashan
Defendant:
State of Arizona, Margaret Swambat, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.